okay !!! so i’ve gotten a lot of messages about this whole ordeal, a lot of which has said the same things to me. i didn’t wish to offend anyone, and honestly, a lot of people who claim do be historians have said that what i have done is not wrong, and i believe that in some sense, since that face-claim was nowhere touching any of the musical people, it wasn’t wrong. but i’m turning off anon for awhile now, because if you do have a problem then please message me about it. i’m just getting rid of the verse to make sure that this problem will cease. i’m not good with any of this stuff, and i’m sorry for anyone who i have disappointed or anything like that. thank you to all who have messaged me, by the way.

 
  1. ratherbedivisivethanindecis-blog said: I’m a historian. An actual, literal, historian. That’s what my degree is in. I can say, in no uncertain terms, that there is /no reason/ to have a white fc to make your verse more “historical”. It’s how you write her, not the fc that you’re using. One can be completely historically accurate without having a white fc. White doesn’t make it right. The information you use is what makes it historically accurate.
  2. ncright-blog posted this

"you will never find"

with pale and delicate skin, her beauty held no bounds. her heart was what everyone saw, her smile was what everyone wanted.

"anyone as"

indiependent and private elizabeth schuyler. penned by sydney.

"trusting or as kind"

DRAFTS: thirty plus.
STARTERS: twenty plus.
INBOX: ten plus.